The first argument that can be presented to develop my position is that¡­ A www.test99.com
good example may be found in the case that¡­ Under this circumstance, it is www.test99.com
obvious that¡­. www.test99.com

In addition, there is another reason for me to choose this statement. The www.test99.com
reason is not far to seek¡­. To illustrate, let us consider that ¡­ Hence, www.test99.com
another equally important aspect is that¡­. www.test99.com

Admittedly, it may be true that ¡­. in some conditions. However, this alone www.test99.com
does not constitute a sufficient support to claim that ¡­.,Actually, these www.test99.com
cases are rare and therefore are too specific and too weak to strengthen www.test99.com
the view that¡­When the advantages and disadvantages of x and y are www.test99.com
carefully examined, the most striking conclusion is obvious that¡­ www.test99.com

To sum up, due to the above mentioned reasons, which sometimes correlate www.test99.com
with each other to generate an integrate whole and thus become more www.test99.com
convincing than any single one of them, we may be comfortable to say that www.test99.com
¡­., because¡­. www.test99.com

ARGUMENT www.test99.com

In this argument, the author concludes that¡­ To support his conclusion, www.test99.com
the author points out that¡­. In addition, the author reasons that¡­ www.test99.com
Further more, he also assumes that ¡­ . At first glance, the author¡¯s www.test99.com
argument appears to be somehow appealing, while a close examination will www.test99.com
reveal how groundless it is. We do not have to look very far to see the www.test99.com
invalidity of this argument. This argument is problematic for the following www.test99.com
reasons. www.test99.com

In the first place, this argument rests on a gratuitous assumption that ¡­. www.test99.com
The author unfairly assumes that¡­. However, the assumption is questionable www.test99.com
because the author provides no evidence to support this argument. The www.test99.com
arguer fails to take into account other facts that might contribute to the www.test99.com
result that ¡­¡­.. It is likely that , ¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­..; it is also likely that www.test99.com
¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­ Any of these scenarios, if true, would show that www.test99.com
¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­.. (72) www.test99.com
Therefore, this argument is unwarranted without ruling out such possibility. www.test99.com

In the second place, the argument commits a logic fallacy of ¡°after this www.test99.com
and therefore because of this¡±. In no case can the mere fact that¡­ be www.test99.com
cited as evidence to support the assumption that there is a causal-effect www.test99.com
relationship between A and B. Moreover, that just because B can be www.test99.com
statistically correlated with A does not necessarily mean that A is the www.test99.com
cause of B. In fact, the author has obviously neglected the possibility of www.test99.com
other alternative facts such as¡­, or ¡­ may contribute to a certain extent www.test99.com
to B. It may be only a coincidence that ¡­¡­ . Unless the author can rule www.test99.com
out other factors relevant to ¡­, this assumption in question can not be www.test99.com
accepted. www.test99.com

In the third place, the evidence that the author provides is insufficient www.test99.com
to support the conclusion drawn from it. One example is rarely sufficient www.test99.com
to establish a general conclusion. Unless the arguer can show that A1 is www.test99.com
representative of all A, the conclusion that B¡­ is completely unwarranted. www.test99.com
In fact, in face of such limited evidence, it is fallacious to draw any www.test99.com
conclusion at all. www.test99.com

In the fourth place, the argument has also committed a false analogy www.test99.com
fallacy. The argument rests on the assumption that A is analogous to B in www.test99.com
all respects, and the author assumes without justification that all things www.test99.com
are equal, and that the background conditions have remained the same at www.test99.com
different times or at different locations. There is, however, no guarantee www.test99.com
that this is the case. Nor does the author cite any evidence to support www.test99.com
this assumption. Lacking this assumption, the conclusion that ¡­ is www.test99.com
entirely unfounded. In fact, it is highly doubtful that the facts drawn www.test99.com
from B are applicable to A. Differences between A and B clearly out weight www.test99.com
the similarities, thus making the analogy highly less than valid. For www.test99.com
example, A..., however, B.... Thus, it is likely much more difficult for B www.test99.com
to do.... www.test99.com

www.test99.com
In addition, the conclusion unjustifiably relies on the poll while the www.test99.com
validity of the survey itself is doubtful. The poll cited by the author is www.test99.com
too vague to be informative. The claim does not indicate who, when, how and www.test99.com
by whom the survey is conducted, neither does it mention what is the sample www.test99.com
size, or how the samples are selected. Until these questions are answered www.test99.com
the results are worthless as evidence to support that¡­. www.test99.com

Besides, the author assumes that A and B are mutually exclusive www.test99.com
alternatives. However, the author has never offered any reasons or www.test99.com
evidences for imposing an either/or choice. Common sense and observation www.test99.com
tells us that adjoining both A and B might produce better results. www.test99.com

www.test99.com
To sum up, the conclusion lacks credibility because the evidence cited in www.test99.com
the analysis does not lend strong support to what the author claims. To www.test99.com
make the argument more convincing concerning¡­. , the arguer would have to www.test99.com
provide more information that¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­. The arguer should also www.test99.com
demonstrate that¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­.to make this argument logically acceptable. www.test99.com
(51) www.test99.com

Since the author commits the above mentioned logical mistakes and fails to www.test99.com
consider the whole situation comprehensively, his ideas should not be www.test99.com
adopted. The conclusion would be strengthened if he¡­. www.test99.com

In conclusion, the arguer fails to substantiate his claim that ¡­. Because www.test99.com
the evidence cited in the analysis does not lend strong support to what the www.test99.com
arguer claims. To strengthen the argument, the arguer must convince us www.test99.com
that¡­. In addition, the arguer could have to provide more precise www.test99.com
information to support his claim. www.test99.com

www.test99.com
It is entirely possible that management has become lax regarding any number www.test99.com
of factors that can affect the bottom line such as inferior products, www.test99.com
careless product pricing, inefficient production, poor employee expense www.test99.com
monitoring, ineffective advertising, sloppy buying policies and other www.test99.com
wasteful spending. www.test99.com