|
|
一篇没有难词的GRE作文考试范文
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
广告招租，e-mail:yesize@hotmail.com Issue 13 "Most people would agree that buildings represent a valuable record of any society’s past, but controversy arises when old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes. In such situations, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings so that contemporary needs can be served." The speaker asserts that wherever a practical, utilitarian need for new buildings arises this need should take precedence over our conflicting interest in preserving historic buildings as a record of our past. In my view, however, which interest should take precedence should be determined on a case-by-case basis--and should account not only for practical and historic considerations but also aesthetic ones. 我觉得这样的开头非常适合于陈述自己的反对观点：先重述一遍原文的观点，然后提出自己的反对观点，甚至有所发挥。 精华：The speaker asserts that…In my view, however,… take precedence over… …should be determined on a case-by-case basis, and should account not only for…but also… In determining whether to raze an older building, planners should of course consider the community’s current and anticipated utilitarian needs. For example, if an additional hospital is needed to adequately serve the health- care needs of a fast-growing community, this compelling interest might very well outweigh any interest in preserving a historic building that sits on the proposed site. Or if additional parking is needed to ensure the economic survival of a city’s downtown district, this interest might take precedence over the historic value of an old structure that stands in the way of a parking structure. On the other hand, if the need is mainly for more office space, in some cases an architecturally appropriate add-on or annex to an older building might serve just as well as razing the old building to make way for a new one. Of course, an expensive retrofit might not be worthwhile if no amount of retrofitting would meet the need. 从正反两方面阐明了自己关于有无必要preserve the historic buildings, which is largely based on proper situations.正反两方面这样的论述方法是......
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
加入最爱
热门小游戏分类 
